HALion also has far better developer documentation, publicly available, because - like Kontakt - it allows any owner of the product to create content and distribute it to other HALion users for consumption. AFAIK, Falcon is still pegged to one CPU Core. HALion has better Multi-Core utilization. You can create your own VST Sound Libraries and distribute them to HALion Sonic and HALion Sonic SE users.Īfter installation they will show up in the MediaBay Browser - complete with Iconography, tagging, and library-specific GUI in the product. Most other "Samplers" are only about cutting up and working with pre-recorded audio.įalcon doesn't allow you to create Instrument Libraries that you can distribute to Falcon, UVI Workstation or MachFive users to load into the browser of those products - unless you get a Developer License from UVI (which apparently isn't all that cheap, but that's hearsay). They are some of the last holdovers when it comes to "Samplers" that actually allow you to Live Sample (think MPC or Maschine Live Sampling Workflow). This goes for both HALion 6 and Groove Agent 5. HALion allows you to Sample Live Audio Input. I also think it has better Wavetable Synthesis. ![]() They do give you a sizeable voucher that can be used to buy a couple/few expansions, though. ![]() You'd have to pay UVI for additional libraries to get anything comparable.įalcon ships, by default, with a Factory Library comparable to most other Synths on the market. The bigger differences are:įalcon doesn't ship with any Acoustic Instrument Libraries, while HALion ships with a very nice Factory Library of Acoustic and Synthesized Instruments/Libraries. Falcon and HALion are largely comparable.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |